Paint Color Goes With Travertine Outdoors?

From The Team ...

Seven Readers

!!...

After being announced with great fanfare as the great program that would vindicate the Federal Police the country, the television series Team come to an end next Friday.

Encouraged by the very Federal Public Security Secretariat (which also provided personnel and vehicles to appear on the series) The Team wanted to show the federal police as heroes rather than fighting with the evil represented by the criminals. Yesterday the producer Pedro Torres has announced that the program will conclude on Friday.

Let us briefly

exercise: compare for a moment to Team with the great classic TV is 24. As you all know 24 was a high ideological program was a good American, Jack Bauer , struggling with all the methods available to stop terrorist threats against his country. What was even violating the law and against many times their own government. In fact, the best times were those in which Bauer had to contend with the prevailing corruption in the highest echelons of American government corruption that reached even to the President of the United States. Yes, it was a series high ideological but its credibility rested on the fallibility of the characters and the system they sought to defend. Now consider

Team: a difference of 24 police officers here were immaculate and incorruptible beings, belonging to a political system filled with good people and ready to do anything to stop the evil drug dealers. Team policemen were beautiful people, determined to sacrifice everything, while the criminals were depicted as ugly and rude types whose crime was supported by the simple and pathetic fact of being "bad" rather than be the product of a system in which corruption and lack of opportunity are generators of criminals. They were the evil trying to destroy a perfect nation, whose perfect police were to prevent such a thing and in a country like Mexico where the majority of the population distrusts their policemen, almost immaculate beings present gave the series a no credibility.

As has transpired in various media the cancellation of the team up to pressure from other federal agencies involved in the fight against organized crime - particularly the Ministry of Defence - which complained that the series only lofty work Genaro Garcia Luna and looked at first with the image of coordination which purport to show those responsible for national security. That is, the team showed success against crime as a particular achievement of García Luna and police officers responsible.

Team was actually an ideology videhome with infomercial, designed as a propaganda tool of the Federal Police and can be seen as part of Agreement Coverage For Briefing Violence signed by Televisa and other media, which sought - among other things - highlighting the achievements of government in the war against crime. Now point

to the computer as the first collateral damage of this agreement. So things

Tuesday ... Health

 ... well ...

Windows System Error In Knowndll

Of The King's Speech ...

Seven Readers !!... There

films made for the sole purpose of being nominated for the Oscar . King's Speech is one of them. executive producers Bob Weinstein Harvey and business know they have been producing films like The English Patient, Pulp Fiction, The Lord of The Rings, The Fighter and The Aviator to name a few movies who have funded and ultimately won any number of Academy Awards Hollywood . In other words know the formula for success to come up with the taste of the members of the Academy and out of an awards ceremony with several Oscars under his arm.

And although they have produced films that have come out victorious risky, they know perfectly what is the formula for secure nominations. The Speech of the King is a film: a film to come out winning formula. I'm not saying by this that we are confronting a very original film and cinematic qualities lacking, but if we put a little head to the matter we see that the film contains some features that have proven effective part of a formula to win a victory in the Best Picture category:

1 - tells the story of a character with physical disabilities who will have to overcome to reach beyond.

2 - Place the film in an important historical moment. If it can be before, during or after some kind of war that certainly helps. It provides secure nominations in the categories of art direction and costumes, both the catapult to achieve recognition in other major.

3 - has solid script, but not out of the traditional rules, a script full of intelligent dialogue, particularly between the main characters.

4 - has a climactic climax, exciting, with some epic background music. About the same building and an assembly that can see how that time is transcendent to the context of the film.

5 - The cast is made up of great actors, able to move fully to the audience and achieved memorable performances.

And Voila! Here we have a winning film audiences and of course the members of the Academy. This is the case of the king's speech.

Director Tom Hooper (whose previous film United Damn it seems more original) tells an epic story: the king of England stutter George VI and his struggle to become a good monarch at a crucial moment in British history: the onset of World War II. A man who comes to the throne after the abdication of his brother controversial Eduardo . supported by his wife Elizabeth, Jorge found in the Australian maestro Lionel Logue diction who not only assist you to overcome your disability, but also become one of his greatest friends.

is no doubt that film's best moments are those that occur between Colin Firth and Geoffrey Rush when Hooper decided to explore the relationship between two men coming from diametrically opposed worlds, when you become the support of another when both are filing a deep friendship.

the king's speech is a film told with great talent. It is a film well acted and full of great moments. However, it remains a movie built with the clear objective of winning an Oscar. After seeing - many months after his triumph - reaffirmed my feeling that the Academy should reward Social Network, a film more risky, more complete and complex, away from explicit fees do not have to determine the Oscars to the winners.

So things said Monday ...

Health

 ... well ...

How To Fix Rc Radio Shack Transmiter

From the Spanish Revolution ...

Seven Readers! ..

Something is happening in the world, something really interesting. A revolutionary kind of wick begins to spread over the entire planet. Where to start? That seems irrelevant and even misleading. Some say that little Iceland was the first example. There on a Saturday morning in 2008 Hördur Torfarson stood in front of the Icelandic parliament, was carrying a guitar and a microphone. It was a difficult time for the tiny nation Arctic: its main bank had gone bankrupt and the Icelandic financial system was almost a disaster. Torfarson took his guitar, started singing and asked the people who passed their views about what was happening in those days. The next Saturday he did the same gathering a couple of dozen more people and so on, until Saturday Icelandic led to the dissolution of the Icelandic parliament in 2009. The Icelandic bankers pursued their disaster began and even 25 citizens elected to draft a new constitution. Everything they did from below, from the public.

That in a country of just 320000 inhabitants say it all started.

Then came Wikileaks exposing the tricks that occur in high diplomatic freedom of the network proved its worth. Of ahí – impulsadas por las redes sociales – vinieron las protestas en el mundo árabe. Dictaduras y monarquías del medio oriente temblaron por la presión de las multitudes que salieron a las calles a pedir, a exigir un cambio en sus sociedades.

Hoy es España.

A unos días de las elecciones del domingo 22 los ciudadanos españoles han salido a las calles a pedir, a exigir, un cambio en el sistema político de su país. En las manifestaciones españolas no caben los partidos políticos, tampoco los sindicatos. Es la ciudadanía, y lo más importante la ciudadanía jóven you are asking their politicians, their leaders a shift in economic issues in society.

English movement's manifesto - called Democracy Now describes them perfectly:

"We are ordinary people. We like you: people who get up every morning to study, work or to find work, people who have family and friends. People who work hard every day to live and give a better future for those around us.

Some of us consider it more progressive, others more conservative. Some believers, some not. Some have well-defined ideology, apolitical other ... But we believe we are all concerned and outraged by the political, economic and social development we see around us. Through the corruption of politicians, businessmen, bankers ... In the helplessness of ordinary people. "

Citizens on foot who want to change things from below.

Someone told me recently that this type of movement is doomed to failure because it needs support from any sector of the elites in power. Maybe. But Iceland, Egypt and Spain are perhaps beginning to show that the system may tremble when the people organize, that these elites may be exceeded and that change can come from below. Perhaps due to technological tools with which we now have, with the ability of organization that can occur from the use thereof - particularly from social networks - the time has come for citizens. It is perhaps time for change the time to show that another world is possible.

So things Thursday ... Health

 ... well ...

Ap Us History Old Exams

The International Day Against Homophobia and campaign ...

Seven Readers !!...

Today in the worldwide International Day Against Homophobia . We have chosen to May 17 because on a day like today but in 1990, the World Health Organization removed homosexuality from its list of mental disorders. Since that day the scientific community unanimously, accepted homosexuality as a natural variation of human sexuality.

Yet the way in the world to eradicate the ignorance that gives rise to homophobia is very long.

recently in the city of Guadalajara, of conservative groups called for an "anti-gay march" - disguised under the moniker of "up to defend the family" - which is another example of intolerance certain groups that encourage - tacitly or explicitly - the hatred for homosexuals. Of course, the march organizers anti gay are within their rights to express their ideas, but the issue here is that what you're asking is that people exist in the country first - the heterosexual - to enjoy all their rights and second-class citizens - homosexuals - who lack them. Discrimination against lesbians, gays and transsexuals is deplorable because it is aimed to deprive people of their rights based on their orientation sexual.

Mexico ranks second in homophobic killings in the Americas. From 1995 to date, there have been more than 400 hate crimes against gays and lesbians, according to the Citizens Against Hate Crimes. Yucatan, by the way, ranks fourth nationally in various Mexican states with more hate crimes was the product of the LGBT community.

But there is an alarming figure: in four murders, only one is investigated. Authorities have yet to be made aware and change their perspective about homophobia. Statements like those of Colima Ombudsman show that even within those who claim to defend human rights of people there is a high degree of ignorance and intolerance.

The case, however, must begin with ourselves and those around us. It is a process that starts within families and friends, creating awareness of the fact that equality is their origin to the recognition of diversity. There is perhaps the closest personal contexts where we might find the biggest obstacles to overcome ignorance and hatred that emanates from it, but that side we start. Only in this way in the future - that still seems far away - full recognition of the rights of all of us can lead a society equally and without discrimination.

campaign ...

still can not find a satisfactory explanation to define the program Campaneando that started a couple of weeks its news broadcasts at the end of TV Azteca's stellar . This is an unstructured exercise, meaningless, in which drivers Monica Garza, Carolina Rocha Vicente Galvez and comment by way of some of the gossip political facts of the country and those involved in them. Do not conclude anything, no analysis of them. This is loose talk of verbiage pure political commentary to bring the level of nonsense program. However, until Ventaneando has a minimum of structure and at least the drivers seem to have any idea what they will talk and how complete their comments, something that no campaign.

Who is the program for?, "The audience that would normally escape to the issues of a political nature?, Do you try anything to interest them, thus becoming truly transcendent issues for the country in matters of laundry?. I do not understand a concept is simply inexplicable and meaningless. Even you can still see the political will to put TV Azteca to air as their total lack of production inhibits the scan of it.

So seasoned Seven Readers, I ask you if you have an explanation campaigns will ask you to share it ...

Health  ... well ...